Dhanvantree

Menu

Dhanvantree

Menu

Dhanvantree

Menu

Why Chasing the Highest Return Mutual Fund Can Hurt Long-Term Wealth

Why Chasing the Highest Return Mutual Fund Can Hurt Long-Term Wealth

Introduction

I’ve seen this so many times now that it’s almost predictable.

“Which fund is producing the greatest returns?”

Genuine question. In the past, even I had the same thoughts. But after working directly with investors over time, I realised that many avoidable investing mistakes often begin with this line of thinking.

It’s natural to look at past returns but chasing the highest return mutual fund based on past performance is one of the most predictable ways to undermine long-term wealth creation.

When Logic Reverses at the Market Gate

In everyday life, our actions are quite sensible. You don’t rush to buy more when petrol prices rise. You feel happy buying at lower prices when there is a sale. However, in the stock market and mutual fund investing, this logic often reverses. When the market rises, we feel secure and invest more. When it falls, we become afraid and stop SIPs. This behaviour can be counterproductive for long-term investing.

An actual situation many investors recognise: certain categories of mutual funds performed well over a period and naturally attracted more investor attention. But when markets were weak, most people did not want to invest. They invested only after witnessing strong returns, felt uneasy during volatility, and then asked:
 “Should I exit, sir?”

This is often less about the market and more about investor behaviour. The pattern rarely changes. We invest in a fund that’s doing well, it slows down the following year, a different fund rises to the top, we switch and we believe we are acting wisely.

In reality, we are chasing past performance, entering late, and interrupting compounding.

The Hidden Cost: The Behaviour Gap

Real data backs this up: AMFI data showed that 53.38 lakh SIP accounts were discontinued or completed in March, while 52.82 lakh new SIP accounts were registered during the same period. The SIP stoppage ratio rose to 100%, up from 76% in February, even as monthly SIP contributions reached a record ₹32,000 crore.

One straightforward but difficult-to-accept truth: investments with higher return potential may also come with higher volatility and uncertainty. Past performance may or may not be sustained in the future.

Most of us only see returns, not the risk attached to them. What often goes unnoticed is the hidden cost of investor behaviour, something often referred to as the “behaviour gap”. This is the difference between the returns produced by a fund and the returns actually obtained by the investor caused by late entry, early exit, or pausing investments during volatility.

Even SIP Investors Do This

SIP (Systematic Investment Plan) is designed to promote discipline. However, in reality, the pattern often looks like this:

  • Market rising → SIP is started. Confidence is high.
  • Market declining → SIP is paused or stopped. Fear takes over.

This can disrupt rupee cost averaging, one of the core advantages SIPs are designed to provide. Rupee cost averaging works by buying more units when prices are low and fewer when prices are high. Stopping during a fall does the exact opposite of what the strategy intends.

Trying to capture only the highest recent return can come with trade-offs that are often overlooked. In many cases, disciplined investing and consistency may matter more than trying to optimize every market move.

Ask Yourself Before Any Decision

  1. Does this fit my financial objectives?
  2. Can I manage the level of risk involved?
  3. Can I stay invested for the long term?

Because these factors may help investors make more suitable long-term decisions rather than simply chasing the highest recent return.

The Role of a Mutual Fund Distributor

As a Mutual Fund Distributor, our role is to help investors understand mutual fund products, scheme features, associated risks, and the importance of disciplined investing. Investor decisions should always be made based on individual financial goals, risk appetite, and investment horizon.

The goal is not to chase short-term returns, but to use a structured approach aligned with long-term goals. The attraction of higher returns is natural. However, decisions made purely on recent performance may not always produce positive results. A disciplined, goal-focused approach combined with a long-term viewpoint can be more effective in supporting long-term wealth creation.

Investor behaviour may often matter more than chasing the best recent performer.

Statutory Disclaimer: Mutual Fund investments are subject to market risks. Please read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing.

Data Disclaimer: Data referenced in this article is based on publicly available sources including AMFI and third-party research platforms, and is for informational purposes only. This article is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Investors should evaluate suitability based on their financial goals, risk appetite, and consult a qualified financial professional before making investment decisions.

Note: Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Please read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. The past performance of the schemes is neither an indicator nor a guarantee of future performance.

Table of Contents

Ready to make your first investment? Get in touch.

Contact Us
Posted by on | Featured | No Comments

The Sandwich Generation Trap: Why Indian Millennials Are Getting Two Sets of Investment Ideas And Missing a Third Conversation Entirely

The Sandwich Generation Trap: Why Indian Millennials Are Getting Two Sets of Investment Ideas And Missing a Third Conversation Entirely

Introduction

For Indian millennials, the FD vs mutual funds debate isn’t just financial – it’s personal. It’s the first week of the month. Your salary lands. Before you’ve made a single decision, the advice starts flooding in from two very different directions.

Your parents say: “Fixed Deposit. Property. Gold. It’s safe. We built everything on this.” Your Instagram feed says: “FDs are outdated. Open a SIP. Buy the Nifty 50 index fund and forget it.”

You nod to both. The money sits in your savings account. Weeks pass. This hesitation — this paralysis between two eras of financial thinking is the invisible tax on your wealth.

This is what we call the Sandwich Generation problem. Indians are uniquely caught between their parents’ proven-but-dated financial playbook and a new-wave narrative that dismisses everything their parents built. Both sides have a point. Both sides are missing something.

This article doesn’t pick a side. It builds the case for a third, more important conversation grounded in what the data says in 2026, not what worked in 1995 or went viral last month.

Fixed Deposits for Indian Millennials: Safe, But Are the Returns Enough?

Let’s start with Fixed Deposits. Your parents were not wrong to trust them. India’s banking FD system is DICGC-insured up to ₹5 lakh per depositor per bank, backed by a subsidiary of the RBI. The returns are predictable. For deposits within DICGC insurance limits, the risk of permanent capital loss is relatively low, though access and liquidity may still depend on resolution timelines.

So the question was never really about safety. It was always about whether safety alone is sufficient over a 10–20 year wealth-building horizon. And that’s where the numbers deserve a closer look.

FD Interest Rates India: What Are They Actually Paying in 2026?

As of April 2026, FD rates across major banks sit between 5–7% (Source: Mint). At the same time, India’s average CPI inflation over the last decade has hovered around 5%, according to MOSPI data  meaning an average household has had to spend roughly 5% more on goods and services every single year, year after year.

When you place those two numbers side by side, the picture becomes clear. FDs are traditionally considered safer instruments, but they may not always generate returns that significantly outpace inflation. That distinction matters enormously when you’re trying to build wealth, not just preserve it.

Property Investment India: Why the Math Has Changed for Millennials

Property built genuine, generational wealth for Indian families. Your parents likely bought a home in the late 1980s or 1990s at prices that today seem remarkably low. But the conditions that made possible low entry prices, rising middle-class incomes, limited supply competition are structurally different today, and the numbers reflect that shift clearly.

What Has Actually Happened to Prices?

In Delhi-NCR, residential prices have risen over 81% in just five years, far outpacing salary growth that averaged 8–10% annually over the same period (Source: Week). To put that in practical terms: a home that cost ₹50 lakh in Noida in 2020 costs approximately ₹90–95 lakh today. The salary that was meant to fund that purchase has grown by perhaps 40–50% over the same period.

For many middle-income households in earlier decades, home ownership was often achievable at materially lower income multiples than it is today.

Applying old rules to new prices is where the trap begins. This doesn’t mean property is a poor long-term asset. It means it requires significantly more capital, longer timelines, and more careful planning than it did for the previous generation and deserves honest analysis rather than assumption.

Mutual Funds via SIP: Real Data on What Indian Millennials Are Actually Doing

Something significant has happened in Indian financial markets over the last five years that makes this conversation more urgent than ever. According to AMFI’s official March 2026 data, the mutual fund industry’s AUM now stands at ₹73.73 lakh crore, with 9.72 crore active SIP contributing accounts. Monthly SIP contributions reached ₹32,087 crore in March 2026, and equity schemes have recorded 61 consecutive months of net positive inflows since March 2021.

These are not abstract numbers. They represent millions of Indian households, many of them first-generation equity investors choosing to stay invested through market ups and downs, month after month. Systematic investing through SIPs creates the discipline of contributing through market cycles, which over long periods has historically helped investors participate in equity market growth. For someone with a 15–25 year investment horizon, equity mutual funds deserve a meaningful role in their portfolio.

But the internet has a tendency to simplify nuanced ideas into easy slogans. “Just buy the Nifty 50 index fund and forget it” is one of them. That framing creates confusion rather than simplifying things. Investing works very differently depending on where an approach holds up and where it breaks down. That’s the difference between a strategy and a prescription.

Active vs. Passive Funds: A Decision Based on Context, Not Conviction

As the financial market is dependent on many factors, giving any general statement does not hold any merit on it. There have been periods where certain actively managed funds have shown relative resilience compared to benchmarks. However, this varies across market cycles and fund categories.

There have been market phases where certain actively managed small-cap strategies have shown different downside and return outcomes relative to their benchmarks. However, these outcomes have not been uniform across market cycles, fund categories, or time periods, and are influenced by fund selection, costs, and portfolio construction (Source: ValueResearch).

Why? A Nifty 50 stock has 25–30 analysts on it. A quality small-cap company might have two. That information gap is one reason active management is often evaluated in less efficiently tracked market segments, though outcomes remain dependent on market conditions, costs, and portfolio execution.

The active-vs-passive question does not have a single universal answer. The right approach depends on the asset class, market maturity, investment horizon, and cost structure of available options. A blanket rule applied across a heterogeneous market leads to gaps in portfolio construction.

The Third Conversation No One Is Having

Here is where both the FD generation and the Instagram-investing generation fall short. The real question is not “which instrument is best?” The real question is: best for what?

Every financial goal carries a different time horizon, a different risk profile, and a different ideal instrument. Treating all your investments as a single bucket or choosing instruments based on what feels safe or what performed well recently is how people end up with money that isn’t aligned with their actual needs.

The greatest risk isn’t the market. It’s the lack of alignment.

The real mistake isn’t a lack of intent, it’s a lack of alignment. Not knowing which asset class is appropriate for which goal means that even well-intentioned investors can find themselves unable to grow their wealth toward the milestones that matter most to them. We often treat investments like a single bucket when they should be a toolkit, with each tool matched to a specific job.

In parts of India’s mid- and small-cap market, where information coverage and market efficiency can vary, active management may be considered as one approach depending on portfolio objectives and risk tolerance. In other parts of the market, low-cost passive exposure may serve better. Neither answer fits every situation.

Your parents built wealth through consistency using the tools and knowledge that were available to them and that they genuinely understood. The tools look different today. The discipline is the same. Rather than getting stuck in the Sandwich Generation Trap pulled in opposite directions by two incomplete narratives, the goal is a clear resolve to invest according to your individual risk profile, your financial goals, and your investment horizon.

Clarity is the first step toward better financial decision-making.

In situations like these, the role of an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor can be to support investors with more structured financial decision-making. We begin by understanding our clients’ goals and future objectives to gain a clear picture of their current investment position and the financial milestones they aim to achieve. Based on each client’s risk profile, financial goals, and investment horizon, we create client-specific investment strategies. Through in-depth research and analysis of both the market and mutual fund performance, we aim to align investment decisions with long-term financial goals.

Data Disclaimer: Data referenced in this article is based on publicly available sources including AMFI and third-party research platforms, and is for informational purposes only. This article does not constitute investment advice. Please consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Note: Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Please read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. The past performance of the schemes is neither an indicator nor a guarantee of future performance.

Table of Contents

Ready to make your first investment? Get in touch.

Contact Us
Posted by on | Featured | No Comments